The Business Magazine - B2B Business News - Site Logo
The Business Magazine March 2024
Read now
PICK YOUR EDITION

South: A fifth of commercial property failing to meet energy standards 

2 November 2016
Share
property-default

As of April 1 2018, it will be illegal to let or renew the lease of a property that does not meet energy efficiency minimum standards, and is estimated that 20% of UK commercial property will be impacted.

This is a warning from Goadsby commercial director Robert Fairbairn, who added: “From April 1, 2023, the regulations will apply to all leases of properties that have an Energy Performance Certificate (EPC).

"This will affect sales and purchases of investment property, the grant and renewal of existing tenancies, and existing landlords and tenants, and the effects will be widespread.

"Lenders will be particularly concerned that a property that cannot be let will not be income producing and may not be considered to be a suitable security for a loan.

“The new regulations will not be affected by Brexit, although much of the energy efficiency legislation stems from EU directives, it is written into UK law and the Government has renewed its commitment to carbon reduction."

Fairbairn list the key points to think about.

1. Is my property affected?

a. Your property will be affected unless it is listed, is a place of religious worship, is a temporary building with low-energy usage, is scheduled for demolition or is detached and less than 50 sq m in size.

b. The Energy Act 2011 is the source of MEES obligations (s.49 (1) and (6)). If a property that does not have a rating between A or E it will not be legal to let it. The sanction is a fine of up to £150,000 based on rateable value.

c. Properties that require EPCs are affected. Properties that are let for less than six months or more than 99 years are not affected.

d. There are some temporary exemptions, but they have to be claimed and registered on a central public register. The exemption will last for five years.  

e. Exemptions are personal and not transferable (eg to a buyer). The buyer has six months to improve the property or demonstrate that an exemption should be granted.

 

2. Can the property be improved to meet the standard?

Some works that can improve the rating can be very cost effective, such as upgrading to more efficient lighting.  Other works that may improve the rating include upgrading the boiler and improving insulation; in some cases improvements to the fabric of the building may be necessary and these could be costly and affect the valuation of the building. 

Each property needs to be looked at individually, and Fairbairn reports that he is already undertaking investigations on behalf of some landlords.

 

3. Does the landlord have the right to carry out improvement works?

The answer depends primarily on the terms of the lease. If the improvements can be carried out without the landlord needing to gain access to the tenant’s premises or infringing the rights granted to the tenant, or if the lease gives the landlord a right to enter the tenant’s premises to carry out improvements, there should be no difficulty in principle.

In other cases, it may well be necessary to obtain tenants’ consent, and tenants may well impose conditions and/or want something in return.

4. Can the tenant behave in such a way as to impact the landlord’s exposure to MEES risk?

a. Yes, unless the lease provides protection. This depends on the lease terms. For example, the landlord is commonly not able to withhold consent for the tenant to carry out improvements. Whether a particular piece of work is an improvement is judged from the tenant’s perspective. Some improvements could lower the EPC rating, for example, in a shop the tenant may want to install an inefficient air curtain heating system over the entrance; this could push the EPC rating below the minimum threshold.

b. A well-drawn new lease will provide the landlord with various protections so that the landlord is able to refuse consent to works that would adversely affect the environmental performance of the property. Landlords should be seeking to introduce this kind of provision whenever the opportunity arises to do so.

5. Will there be an effect on rent review?

a. Yes, unless the lease provides protection in the rent review provisions. For example, if the premises with a review to open market rent fall below the minimum energy efficiency threshold the tenant is likely to argue that there is no evidence of rental value in the open market as letting the property would be illegal. 

b. A well-drawn new lease will address this and include appropriate rent review assumptions. Landlords need to plan ahead how they can introduce these vital protections.

6. What impact does MEES have on repairing obligations?

a. The lease needs to be looked at carefully. In a standard multi-let, full repairing and insuring lease, the responsibility for external and structural repair may fall primarily on the landlord, with an ability to recoup the cost from the tenants. Whether such an arrangement would allow the landlord to upgrade the property by improving its energy efficiency, preserving or enhancing its capital value, at the expense of the tenants, who may benefit from reduced operating costs through greater energy efficiency, is very much open to doubt and unlikely to be specifically covered in historic lease drafting. 

b. An argument that is sometimes raised is that that most leases will impose an obligation on the tenant to comply with statutory requirements and this should cover the MEES obligations. This is unlikely to hold up, depending on the precise wording. Normally, the tenant has to comply with “requirements” relating to the condition of the property: the MEES obligation is not to let sub-standard property – there is no requirement to improve it as such.

7. Can the risk be mitigated on renewal?

An existing lease of business premises, which is not protected by the Landlord & Tenant Act 1954, can be renewed upon whatever terms the parties are able to negotiate. A protected tenancy is different in that the tenant is entitled to a court order for a new tenancy and the court will not generally order a new lease on significantly more onerous terms than the old one.  This has not been dealt with in the new regulations and could put a landlord in a difficult position.

 

 

South: A fifth of commercial property failing to meet energy standards
Robert Fairbairn

 


Related topics

Related articles

Upcoming events

view more
06
Jun

South Coast Property Awards 2024

Hilton Southampton
Utilita Bowl
More info
18
Jul

Thames Valley Tech & Innovation Awards 2024

Reading FC Conference & Events
Select Car Leasing Stadium, Reading
More info
12
Sep

Thames Valley Property Awards 2024

Ascot Pavilion
Ascot Racecourse
More info
03
Oct

South Coast Tech & Innovation Awards 2024

Hilton Southampton
Utilita Bowl
More info
07
Nov

Thames Valley Deals Awards 2024

Reading FC Conference & Events
Select Car Leasing Stadium, Reading
More info

Related articles